User Guide
Understanding the inputs, assumptions, and settings that drive the model
Properly interpreting the graph and data table for simulation results
Getting the most out of the analysis and avoiding common mistakes
Methodology
High-powered Monte Carlo simulation
Honest Math uses Monte Carlo simulation as a financial planning tool. Each simulation is comprised of 10,000 trials. Portfolio performance is modeled at the monthly level, offering finer perspectives on portfolio behavior and risk tolerance. Investment returns are sampled with a levy process—a stochastic method used to replicate real-world volatility (“fat tails”).
Technology
State-of-the-art architecture
We’ve partnered with Amazon Web Services (AWS) to leverage the power, speed, and elasticity of the world’s largest cloud-computing platform. This allows us to cost-efficiently execute the tens of millions of calculations required for each simulation in a matter of seconds.
Personal
Tell us a bit about yourself
Basics
Enter your age, retirement status, life expectancy, etc.
Regular Income
If you’re not yet retired, enter your annual income before taxes—a rough estimate is perfectly fine. By default, the model assumes your income will grow at an estimated inflation rate of 2% annually. You’re welcome to change this assumption.
If you’re retired, congrats. Move along.
Retirement Income
Whether or not you’re retired, enter retirement income estimates related to Social Security benefits, pension income, or other revenue (e.g., part-time job). Rough estimates do the trick.
Portfolio
Specify your investable assets, savings habits, and investing style
Portfolio Balance
How much do you have saved for retirement?
Asset Allocation
How is your money allocated between stocks and bonds? Add rows to adjust your holdings over time (e.g., shift from stocks to bonds as you age), if you’d like.
Regular Contributions
If you’re not currently retired, tell us how much of your income you’re saving for retirement each month. You can express this as a percentage of gross income or as a dollar amount.
Special Contributions
If you anticipate occasional irregular portfolio contributions or one-time increases to your nest egg (e.g., selling your primary residence or inheriting wealth), specify it here.
Expenses
Input living expenses, taxes, and other portfolio outflows
Regular Distributions
How much do you expect to spend in retirement each month? Specify your living expenses, ignoring taxes.
Taxes
Taxable Portion of Portfolio
Approximately how much of your portfolio is subject to taxes upon withdrawal? For instance, if your nest egg is split 50/50 between a 401(k) (taxable) and a Roth IRA (tax-exempt), you’d specify 50%.Taxable Portion of Retirement Income
Approximately how much of your retirement income from other sources (i.e. social security, pension, or other income) do you expect to be taxable?Effective Tax Rate
Estimate your effective income tax rate during retirement. Note, this amount represents your tax bill as a percentage of your income. This differs—and is less than—the marginal tax rate associated with your income tax bracket.
Special Withdrawals
If you anticipate irregular cash needs or one-time portfolio withdrawals from your nest egg (e.g., buying a vacation home), specify this detail here.
Settings
Modify capital market assumptions, calibrate the statistical parameters, or specify a Black Swan event
Capital Market Assumptions
Our default assumptions are informed by the prevailing long-term capital market views of prominent investment banks. These parameters are forward-looking, and will change over time as market conditions evolve. Users can modify these assumptions at their discretion. However, we advise caution when deviating from the default inputs, and strongly discourage the use of historical averages.
Riskier Assets (“Stocks”)
The first column (labeled “Stocks”) is designed to model riskier investments. The asset entered into this column is simulated with a fat-tailed probability distribution, which can be calibrated or switched off in the “Fat Tails” section. The default assumptions reflect long-term expectations for U.S. large cap equities (e.g., S&P 500 Index).Less Risky Assets (“Bonds”)
The second column (labeled “Bonds”) is designed to model less risky investments. The asset entered into this column is simulated with a Gaussian distribution (e.g., normal bell curve). The default assumptions for this column reflect the long-term expectations for U.S. investment grade corporate fixed-income securities (e.g., Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate Bond Index).Expected Return: Expected return should be entered as a nominal annual average on an arithmetic basis, not a geometric basis. The arithmetic mean is the baseline location parameter for the random sampling process. The geometric mean is the effective annual compound return, such as the rates of return reported on the results page. In other words, the arithmetic mean is the input, whereas the geometric mean is the output. We explore the concept of expected return is greater detail here.
Standard Deviation: Enter standard deviation on an annualized basis to dictate the expected volatility of each asset class. The volatility for stocks can be further modified by calibrating the “Fat Tails” settings. We explain standard deviation in greater detail here.
Correlation Coefficient: Enter the correlation coefficient that describes the linear relationship between the two portfolio assets. This value should fall anywhere from -1.00 to 1.00, and it helps the simulator appropriately model portfolio behavior. We explain the correlation coefficient in greater detail here.
Fat Tails
Equity markets are more volatile than indicated by statistical models traditionally used to simulate investment performance (e.g., the normal bell curve). By default, our equity performance model uses a stochastic method called a levy process to capture the excess kurtosis of stock prices observed empirically. In other words, we “fatten” the tails of the sampling distribution to more realistically replicate market volatility. Our methodology is the culmination of extensive research and testing. Although the algorithms for implementing our stochastic process are proprietary, the mathematical principals underpinning the framework are well established in academic literature.
Magnitude of Tail Events
Standard: Tail event magnitude is consistent with historical precedent in U.S. markets.
Extreme: Tail event magnitude exceeds historical precedent in U.S. markets.
Frequency of Tail Events
Standard: Tail event frequency is consistent with historical precedent in U.S. markets.
Extreme: Tail event frequency is doubled relative to historical precedent in U.S. markets.
Skewness of Tail Events
Negative: Most tail events are losses (left tail occurrences).
Neutral: Tail event distribution approximates historical precedent in U.S. markets.
Positive: Most tail events are gains (right tail occurrences). It’s fun to dream, isn’t it? Please use with appropriate caution, my optimistic friends.
Black Swan Event
Markets occasionally suffer sudden and extreme shocks, often referred to as tail events or a “Black Swan”. This term was popularized by Nassim Taleb, a statistician, risk analyst, and former options trader that authored a book by the same name. The Black Swan feature allows users to stress test their retirement plan by applying a sudden and extreme drop in portfolio value to every simulation trial.
Results
Saving Results
For convenience, the simulator’s “Save” function is capable of storing information in your web browser, which allows you to sign-in and sign-out from the same device without losing your assumptions. However, if you clear your browsing history and cookies, all simulation settings are permanently erased and returned to their default values.
We don’t monitor or store your assumptions or simulation results on our end. This also means we can’t recover information about your prior assumptions or simulation results.
Pro Tips
Get the most out of your simulation results
Yes—An 80% Success Rate is Sufficient
We take issue with the traditional presentation of Monte Carlo analysis, and we encourage users to avoid obsessing over (literally incalculable) “probabilities”. The percentile window shown—20th to 80th—is wide enough to span a sizable range of feasible scenarios, but not so wide as to unduly distract users with the more remote possibilities. Of course it’s possible that markets suffer unprecedented shocks, or that the financial system collapses entirely. In the case of the latter, however, we’d argue that you’re likely to be less concerned with the value of your portfolio than you are with the size of your close friends.
Generally speaking, if at least 80% of your trials end with a positive portfolio balance, we’d consider you to be in good shape. Although this implies that as many as 1 out of 5 trials would fail in retirement, that’s not actually the case. And even if it were, not all “failure” scenarios are created equally.
For example, take two “failure” trials that run out of money at the respective ages of 75 and 88, each falling shy of an estimated lifespan of 90 years. Simply classifying both of these scenarios as “failures” is misleading and denies the user some very useful information. The latter scenario, for instance, could have likely survived until age 90 with moderate lifestyle adjustments—and such adjustments are actually consistent with observed retiree behavior.
In fact, a sizable body of research indicates that retirees rarely run out of money, even when markets underperform. Instead, people simply adjust their spending based on portfolio performance. In other words, when times are bad, budgets are trimmed—and it’s remarkable how much seemingly minor adjustments in spending can improve the rate of simulation success. Any particular trial that’s doomed for failure on a fixed budget can often be rescued with a variable budget. This means that many “failure” trials could more accurately be described as trials requiring “spending adjustments”. With this perspective, even a simulated success rate of just 50% can be reasonable. Seriously.
Keep in mind that the model should be updated periodically as your portfolio fluctuates in value, market expectations change, and your personal affairs evolve. As your actual pathway unfolds, updating the simulation with the most up-to-date facts will continually shift the 20th to 80th percentile window to reflect your new reality.
Use Sensible Return Assumptions
Some of the most prominent personal finance personalities in the industry are the source of grossly flawed expectations for future investment performance. Using a retirement calculator to grow your portfolio with 10 or 12 percent annual returns is an entertaining exercise that’s illustrative of the power of compound interest. But it’s a terrible way to plan.
First, despite what you may have heard, the long-term nominal average return of the stock market is not 12 percent. The source of this myth is bad math—particularly, conflating arithmetic and geometric averages.
Second, capital market conditions change drastically over time. Interest rates are presently at all-time lows, which has implications for not only bond returns, but also stock returns. There are plenty of reasons to believe that forward-looking investment returns will be considerably lower than they have been over the past century or so.
Keep in mind that our default capital market assumptions are forward-looking estimates informed by prominent investment banks. Although nobody actually knows what the future will bring, we tend to prefer the perspectives of professional economists and portfolio managers to those of talk show personalities. In any event, users are welcome to replace our assumptions with their own.
Don’t Get Lost in the Weeds
When developing a model, it’s easy to reach a point in which the margin of error in the input grossly overshadows the usefulness of the output. This is especially true when forecasting over long horizons, as a subtle change to a single key assumption can have an extraordinary impact over time.
For this reason, we advise against getting bogged down in the minutiae of budgeting specifics, like quantifying the effect of a daily coffee habit on your nest egg, for instance. When it comes to estimating living costs, portfolio contributions, and special expenditures, very round numbers are your friend. Even predicting future tax liabilities—especially those in the distance—is a rather dubious exercise. We recommend using reasonable estimates—or a range of estimates—and running multiple scenarios to test the sensitivity of your assumptions.
We encourage you to focus particularly on exploring and testing the handful of factors that disproportionately impact portfolio performance and the range of simulation results. As it so happens, the big stuff is predominantly outside of your control:
Short-term market behavior (e.g., price volatility)
Long-term market performance (e.g., investment return)
Untimely or unfortunate life events (e.g., sudden job loss)
These factors severely eclipse the impact of trivial budget decisions (just buy the damn coffee). Ensuring these fundamental pieces are modeled thoughtfully is essential to the integrity and usefulness of any serious portfolio simulation. If the most important assumptions are impractical, everything else is a waste of time.